Q: As of the census of 2000, there were 478,403 people,  190,638  households, and 111,904  families residing in the city. The population density was . There were 215,856 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the city was 51.0% African American, 41.5% White American, 0.3% Native American, 1.3% Asian American, 0.0% Pacific Islander American, 3.6% from other races, and 2.2% from Multiracial American. Hispanic or Latino Americans of any race were 7.3% of the population. Ancestry (United States Census) include German Americans (15.2%), Irish American (10.9%), English American (8.7%), Italian American (5.6%), Polish American (3.2%), and French American (3.0%). Out of the total population, 4.5% were foreign born; of which 41.2% were born in Europe, 29.1% Asia, 22.4% Latin American, 5.0% Africa, and 1.9% Northern America.
How many percent of people were not Native American?
A: 99.7

Q: The British also hoped that taking the well-known fort would boost troop morale and honour after their demoralizing battle defeat at Fort Ticonderoga  in July 1758. In August 1758, the British under the command of Lieutenant-Colonel John Bradstreet left Fort Oswego with a force of a little over 3000 men and attacked Fort Frontenac. The fort's garrison of 110 men, commanded by Pierre-Jacques Payen de Noyan et de Chavoy, surrendered and were allowed to leave. Bradstreet captured the fort's supplies and nine French naval vessels, and destroyed much of the fort. He quickly departed to avoid further conflict with any French support troops. For the British, Fort Oswego was secured, and the army's reputation was restored.  For the French, the fort's loss was considered to be only a temporary setback.'Fort Frontenac's surrender did not succeed in completely severing French communications and transportation to the west since other routes were available . Supplies could also be moved west from other French posts .  In the long term, however, the surrender compromised French prestige among the Indians and contributed to the defeat of New France in North America. Since the fort was no longer perceived to be important to the French, it was never rebuilt and was left abandoned for the next 25 years. French imperial power was waning in the late 1750s, and by 1763 France had withdrawn from the North American mainland.  Cataraqui and the remains of Fort Frontenac were relinquished to the British.
Which happened first, the British demoralizing battle defeat of Fort Ticonderoga or their attack on Fort Frontenac?
A: their demoralizing battle defeat at

Q: 1564: The city of Ryazan posad was burned.:47 1571: Russo-Crimean War 1572: Battle of Molodi 1591: Raid reaches Moscow. :116 1591: Artillery stops a raid at Kolomenskoy on the Bank Line. :52 1592: Suburbs of Moscow burned.  Russian troops were away fighting Sweden.:17 1598: Crimeans stopped by Bank Line, withdraw and sue for peace.:46 1614: Nogai raids within sight of Moscow. During the Time of Troubles so many captives were taken that the price of a slave at Kaffa dropped to fifteen or twenty gold pieces.:66 1618: Nogais release 15,000 captives in peace treaty with Moscow. 1632: Force from Livny ambushed by Tatars and Janissaries. 300 killed and the rest enslaved.:67 1632: 20,000 Tatars raid the south, as troops were shifted north for the Smolensk War.:76 1633: 30,000 Tatars cross Abatis and Bank lines. Thousands were captured from Oka region.:76 This was the last deep raid into Muscovy. :26 1635: Many small war parties invaded Russia south of Ryazan.:79 1637,41-43: Several raids were led by Nogais and Crimean nobles without permission of Khan.:90 1643: 600 Tatars and 200 Zaporozhian Cossacks raid Kozlov. 19 were killed, and 262 were captured.:23 1644: 20,000 The Tatars raid southern Muscovy, 10,000 captives.:91 1645: A raid captures 6,000 captives. It is claimed that the Turks encouraged these raids to obtain galley slaves for a war with Venice.:91
What was burned last: Ryazan or suburbs of Moscow?
A: Suburbs of Moscow

Q: By the 1770s, Arakan was a shadow of her former self. Central authority had not existed since 1731. Desperate Arakanese nobles asked King Singu to intervene but Singu refused. In 1784, the Arakanese nobles again asked the new king Bodawpaya, who agreed. An invasion force of over 20,000 men  consisted of land and naval units invaded on 2 December 1784. The combined forces faced little opposition en route to Mrauk-U, and took the capital on 2 January 1785, ending five centuries of Arakanese independence. The army was originally welcomed by the populace who actually greeted them with music along the invasion route. But they soon discovered to their horror, the invasion army's wanton destruction, killings, and especially, the unconscionable removal of their national symbol, the Mahamuni Buddha. They soon organised a resistance movement that would eventually lead the Burmese to the first war with the British in 1824.
How many years after the Central authority had ended did the Arakanese nobles ask the new king Bodawpaya to intervene and he agreed?
A:
53